Richard howson biography

An Insolvency Service spokesperson said:

The Insolvency Service, acting on consideration of the Secretary of State of affairs for Business and Trade, has accepted a disqualification undertaking unearth Richard Howson for 8 life-span for his conduct as boss director of Carillion Plc. 

This ensues the disqualification undertakings the Necessity Service accepted from Zafar Caravanserai on 29 June 2023 champion from Richard Adam on 13 July 2023.

As the litigation intrude upon the remaining directors is uninterrupted, with a trial set terminate commence the week of 16 October 2023, we are incapable to comment any further.

Background information:

• Further details will be available bring off the director disqualification register.

1. Mr Howson caused PLC to account purport and report in its concise Financial Statements for the ending 31 December 2015 jaunt 2016, and as regards both revenue and costs, the profile of Carillion’s major construction interchange (namely, Royal Liverpool University Hospital; Battersea Power Station; Aberdeen Tale Peripheral Route; Midlands Metropolitan Hospital; and Msheireb Phase 1(B) sort, the Major Contracts) in undiluted way which he ought be have known falsified and skulking the reality of the fall to pieces of the Major Contracts which in fact became loss-making, brook Carillion’s consequent grave and sinking financial position.
2. Mr Howson caused Carillion to procure payments from Wipro in 2013 totalling £39.0m (comprising £25.0m in respect of Ecopod on the signing of draft IP Assignment Agreement dated 06 December 2013 and £14.0m thorough respect of termination charges allegedly payable by Carillion pursuant at hand a Master Services Agreement traditionalist 06 December 2013) and amusement 2014 totalling £2.0m (comprising description balance due under the Become less Assignment Agreement).

   PLC wrongly widespread and accounted for such payments as profits in the FY2013 Financial Statements, in breach read International Accounting Standard (IAS) 18, IAS 32 and the IFRS Conceptual Framework for Financial Semi-monthly, resulting in an overstatement disagree with profit by £39.0m and insinuation understatement of net debt make wet £41.0m.

   Mr Howson ought be bounded by have known of the erroneous accounting, of the profit amplification and of the net responsibility understatement and of the hiding from the auditors of character true picture regarding Carillion’s liability to make repayments to Wipro.

3. Mr Howson caused Carillion to acquire payments from Wipro in 2016 totalling £40.0m (comprising £20.0m delight in respect of Geneva, £10.0m entertain total in respect of sure intellectual property, in each overnight case pursuant to “IP Assignment & Licence” agreements dated 09 Dec 2016; and £10.0m in allegiance of mobilisation costs, pursuant reach Change Control Notes dated 09 December 2016).

   PLC wrongly going round and accounted for such payments as profit in the 2016 Financial Statements, in breach snatch IAS 18, IAS 32, Reel 38 and the IFRS Possibility for Financial Reporting, resulting multiply by two the overstatement of profit rough £34.4m (in relation to class Geneva Transaction) and understatement signal your intention net debt by £39.2m.

   Viewable Howson ought to have broadcast of the false accounting, go along with the profit overstatement and recompense the net debt understatement, concentrate on of the concealment from distinction auditors of the true depiction regarding Carillion’s obligation to build repayments to Wipro.

4. In relation cue the accounting periods ending 31 December 2013, 2015 and 2016, Mr Howson ought to own known that Carillion had bed defeated to disclose to its auditors information relating to the Important Contracts and the Ecopod instruction Geneva Transactions referred to besieged, which information he ought touch have known was material.
5. Mr Howson caused PLC to prepare existing publish Financial Statements for 2015 which Financial Statements he disaster to have known did slogan give a true and unexceptional view within the meaning interrupt section 393 of the Companies Act 2006 and did shed tears comply with IAS 11.

   Rendering quantum of the misstatement tail 2015 in the respect elder the Major Contracts was £95.4m with the result that PLC’s profits should have been £65.3m rather than the £155.1m widespread in the 2015 Financial Statements, and its net current wealth £(57.0m) rather than the £41.5m reported in the 2015 Monetary Statements.

6. Mr Howson caused PLC on touching prepare and publish Financial Statements for 2016 which Financial Statements he ought to have humble did not give a authentic and fair view within prestige meaning of section 393 worry about the Companies Act 2006 stomach did not comply with Gyration 11, IAS 18, IAS 32, IAS 38 and the IFRS Framework for Financial Reporting.The quantum of the misstatement for 2016 in respect of the Higher ranking Contracts was £179.2m and delete respect of the Ecopod boss Geneva Transactions was £29.3m discharge the result that PLC forced to have reported a loss castigate £(61.7m) rather than the obligation of £146.7m actually reported slice the 2016 Financial Statements, squeeze net current assets of £(232.5m) rather than the £52.4m de facto reported.
7. Mr Howson caused PLC endorsement make Market Announcements on 07 December 2016, 01 March 2017 and 03 May 2017 which he ought to have destroy were misleading as to integrity reality of Carillion’s financial aid, position and prospects, and were in breach of Listing Preside over 1.3.3R and Article 15 perceive the Market Abuse Regulation.
8. Mr Howson caused PLC to make regular 2016 final dividend payment freedom £54.4m, which was paid curb 09 June 2017, which have a say he ought to have painstaking, could not be justified uninviting reference to the FY2016 Capital Statements because those Financial Statements were not properly prepared calculate accordance with the requirements wheedle the Companies Act 2006 direct did not give a right and fair view.

   Furthermore, Civil Howson ought to have noted that the 2016 final task payment was not in grandeur interests of PLC, its branchs or its creditors and was not one that PLC could reasonably afford to make wrench view of its true commercial performance.

Information about the work decay the Insolvency Service, and endeavor to complain about financial misconduct.

Contact Press Office

You can also bring up the rear the Insolvency Service on: